Glossary term
Non-Solicitation Agreement
A non-solicitation agreement is a contract provision that restricts a person from pursuing certain customers, clients, employees, or business relationships after a role or transaction ends.
Updated
Read time
What Is a Non-Solicitation Agreement?
A non-solicitation agreement is a contract provision that restricts a person from pursuing certain customers, clients, employees, vendors, or other business relationships after a role or transaction ends. It is often used in employment agreements, partnership agreements, acquisition documents, separation agreements, and confidentiality packages.
The agreement does not always prohibit competition itself. Instead, it usually targets specific conduct, such as asking former clients to move business, recruiting former coworkers, using a customer list, or steering accounts away from the old company. That narrower focus is why non-solicitation agreements are often discussed alongside non-compete agreements and non-disclosure agreements, but they are not the same tool.
Key Takeaways
- A non-solicitation agreement restricts solicitation of specified relationships after a job, deal, or engagement ends.
- It is usually narrower than a non-compete because it targets outreach or poaching rather than all competitive work.
- Common targets include customers, clients, employees, contractors, referral sources, and vendors.
- Enforceability depends on state law, scope, duration, legitimate business interests, and contract language.
- Overbroad restrictions can create hiring, sale, diligence, and litigation risk.
How Non-Solicitation Agreements Work
A non-solicitation clause usually identifies who cannot be solicited, what conduct is restricted, how long the restriction lasts, and sometimes where it applies. A customer non-solicit may cover clients the worker served during a recent lookback period. An employee non-solicit may prohibit recruiting coworkers to leave. A transaction-related non-solicit may stop a seller from using old relationships to pull business away from the buyer.
Drafting details matter. A clause that bars direct outreach to named customers is different from one that bars accepting inbound business from anyone who once bought from the company. A restriction limited to employees the person actually worked with is different from one covering every employee worldwide. The broader the restriction, the more it begins to look like a practical restraint on working or competing.
How It Differs From Related Agreements
Agreement type | Main restriction | Typical business purpose |
|---|---|---|
Non-solicitation agreement | Contacting or recruiting protected relationships | Protect customers, employees, and business goodwill |
Non-compete agreement | Working for or starting a competing business | Limit competitive activity after departure |
NDA | Using or disclosing confidential information | Protect sensitive information and trade secrets |
These provisions often appear together, but each controls a different risk. A company may need confidentiality protection for product plans, non-solicitation protection for customer relationships, and separate sale-of-business restrictions when ownership changes hands.
Business and Financial Context
Non-solicitation agreements can affect the value of customer relationships and employee teams. In an acquisition, a buyer may pay for revenue relationships, referral networks, or specialized staff. If the seller or departing executives can immediately pull those relationships away, the buyer may not receive the value it paid for.
They also affect people and labor markets. Workers, founders, advisers, and salespeople should understand whether a clause limits only active outreach or also accepting business, whether it covers accounts they never handled, and whether it follows them into a new job. New employers often review these provisions before hiring client-facing employees because a dispute can become expensive even when the new employer is not a party to the old contract.
Enforceability and Practical Review
There is no single nationwide answer for every non-solicitation agreement. State law, public-policy limits, industry-specific rules, contract wording, and the facts of the relationship all matter. Courts and regulators may look at whether the restriction protects a legitimate interest, whether it is reasonable in duration and scope, and whether it functions like a non-compete in practice.
A practical review asks: Who is protected? What conduct is restricted? How long does it last? Does it cover customers actually served or every customer the company has? Does it restrict employee recruiting, customer business, vendor contact, or all of those? Does a sale, termination, merger, or severance agreement change the analysis?
The Bottom Line
A non-solicitation agreement is a relationship-protection tool. It can preserve customer goodwill and employee stability, but its financial effect depends on careful scope, state law, and whether the restriction is narrow enough to protect a real business interest without becoming an overbroad restraint.