Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF)

Written by: Editorial Team

What Was the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility? The Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF) was a temporary emergency lending program created by the Federal Reserve in response to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Designed to su

What Was the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility?

The Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF) was a temporary emergency lending program created by the Federal Reserve in response to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Designed to support the functioning of the U.S. corporate bond market, the SMCCF enabled the Fed to purchase corporate bonds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the secondary market. This marked a significant expansion of the Federal Reserve's role in financial markets, as it was the first time the central bank directly intervened in the corporate bond market.

Purpose and Context

The SMCCF was introduced alongside the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility (PMCCF) as part of a broader set of tools to stabilize credit markets. In March 2020, as businesses and markets faced heightened uncertainty, credit markets began to freeze. Investors rapidly withdrew from corporate bond funds, liquidity diminished, and risk spreads widened significantly. Companies found it increasingly difficult to borrow, refinance, or issue debt, even if they were fundamentally sound.

To address these challenges, the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury collaborated to establish the SMCCF. The goal was to restore investor confidence, ensure liquidity in corporate debt markets, and prevent a credit crunch that could amplify the economic downturn. By purchasing already-issued corporate debt on the secondary market, the Fed aimed to reduce the cost of borrowing for corporations and support market functioning.

Structure and Operations

The SMCCF was structured as a special purpose vehicle (SPV), with funding provided through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The U.S. Department of the Treasury made an equity investment into the facility through the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), which served to absorb potential losses and enhance the creditworthiness of the facility.

Through the SMCCF, the Fed could purchase:

  • Individual corporate bonds that met specified credit quality and maturity criteria.
  • Corporate bond ETFs, including those with exposure to investment-grade and certain high-yield (fallen angel) bonds.

To qualify for direct bond purchases, corporate issuers had to meet certain standards. Their bonds needed to be rated investment-grade as of March 22, 2020, or have been downgraded to no lower than BB-/Ba3 thereafter—a measure designed to support so-called “fallen angels.” The bonds also had to have a remaining maturity of five years or less.

ETF purchases were intended to support overall market liquidity and price discovery by addressing dislocations in the secondary market. The inclusion of ETFs with high-yield exposure reflected the need to prevent broader market stress from spreading to riskier segments.

Scale and Timeline

The SMCCF officially began purchasing ETFs in May 2020, followed by purchases of individual corporate bonds in June 2020. Though it was authorized to operate through the end of 2020, the facility remained largely dormant after the immediate crisis period, and no new purchases were made after December 31, 2020. The program ceased operations in 2021.

The total size of the SMCCF was authorized at up to $750 billion in conjunction with the PMCCF, with the Treasury providing $75 billion in equity to absorb potential losses. In practice, the SMCCF ultimately purchased a much smaller amount—roughly $14 billion in total assets—indicating that its presence alone helped stabilize markets and that large-scale intervention was not necessary beyond the early stages.

Significance and Impact

Although the SMCCF was relatively modest in terms of actual spending, it had an outsized psychological impact. Its announcement and launch helped reverse the sharp deterioration in corporate bond markets. Credit spreads narrowed, issuance resumed, and investors regained confidence. Many companies successfully issued new debt without having to rely on direct support from the Fed.

The facility also represented a departure from past central bank interventions. Prior to 2020, the Federal Reserve had not purchased corporate debt, focusing instead on Treasury and agency securities. The SMCCF expanded the Fed’s toolkit and signaled its willingness to intervene more directly in credit markets during times of extreme stress.

Critics raised concerns about the potential long-term consequences of such interventions, including moral hazard, market distortions, and the blurring of lines between fiscal and monetary policy. Others argued that the facility was necessary and effective, given the extraordinary conditions of the pandemic.

Legacy and Lessons

The SMCCF remains a case study in crisis response. It demonstrated how central banks could deploy unconventional tools to stabilize markets beyond traditional government securities. The relatively small scale of purchases, combined with their large effect on market conditions, highlighted the power of signaling and the importance of central bank credibility.

It also underscored the need for coordination between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, especially when creating facilities that involve fiscal backstops. The SMCCF’s design—with Treasury equity absorbing losses—helped protect the Fed’s balance sheet and ensured broader political and financial support.

Looking ahead, the SMCCF may influence how future crises are managed, particularly in terms of what types of assets the Fed may consider purchasing and how quickly such facilities can be mobilized.

The Bottom Line

The Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility was a temporary, emergency tool that allowed the Federal Reserve to stabilize the corporate bond market during the COVID-19 crisis. While its direct financial footprint was limited, it played a key role in restoring market function and confidence. It marked a significant evolution in the Fed’s crisis-response capabilities and provided valuable insights into the role of central banks in modern financial systems.