Glossary term
Non-GAAP
Non-GAAP refers to financial measures that are not calculated strictly under generally accepted accounting principles and are presented as supplements to GAAP results.
Updated
Read time
What Does Non-GAAP Mean?
Non-GAAP refers to financial measures that are not calculated strictly under generally accepted accounting principles and are presented as supplements to GAAP results. Common examples include adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS, free cash flow, core earnings, and company-specific operating profit measures.
Non-GAAP measures can help explain performance, but they are management-defined. That means investors need to read the reconciliation, the adjustment list, and the reason the company says the measure is useful.
Key Takeaways
- Non-GAAP measures adjust or supplement standard accounting results.
- Public companies must follow SEC rules when presenting non-GAAP financial measures.
- Useful non-GAAP measures can improve comparability or isolate unusual items.
- Misleading non-GAAP measures can make performance look smoother, stronger, or less costly than GAAP results show.
How Non-GAAP Measures Work
A company begins with a GAAP measure such as net income, operating income, cash flow from operations, or earnings per share. It then adjusts for selected items. The company may exclude restructuring costs, acquisition expenses, impairments, stock-based compensation, gains on sales, foreign-exchange effects, or other items.
The adjustment can be reasonable when it separates a truly unusual event from ongoing performance. It becomes weaker when the excluded costs are recurring, cash-based, or central to how the company operates.
Common Non-GAAP Measures
Measure | What it often tries to show |
|---|---|
Earnings per share after selected adjustments | |
Adjusted EBITDA | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and other adjustments |
Free cash flow | Cash generation after capital spending, depending on definition |
Recurring operating profit after selected exclusions |
SEC Disclosure Context
SEC rules generally require public companies that disclose non-GAAP financial measures to present the most directly comparable GAAP measure and reconcile the two when required. SEC staff guidance also cautions against non-GAAP presentations that are misleading, inconsistently calculated, or more prominent than GAAP results in certain contexts.
That framework exists because non-GAAP numbers can influence investor perception. A company can comply formally and still deserve scrutiny if the adjusted measure tells a much rosier story than the audited financial statements.
Prominence, Consistency, and Recurring Costs
Three issues deserve special attention. Prominence asks whether management is leading with the adjusted number while burying the GAAP result. Consistency asks whether the company changes the definition over time in a way that makes trends look better. Recurring-cost quality asks whether the company repeatedly excludes expenses that are normal for the business.
For example, a one-time legal settlement may be a reasonable adjustment in some analyses. A restructuring charge that appears almost every year is harder to treat as unusual. Stock-based compensation is another common debate: it may be noncash in the current period, but it still transfers value to employees and can dilute shareholders.
How to Read Non-GAAP Figures
Investors should ask four questions. What GAAP measure is the starting point? What was adjusted? Are the adjustments genuinely unusual? Does the non-GAAP trend match cash flow and business fundamentals?
Large gaps between GAAP and non-GAAP results are not automatically bad, but they require explanation. The more recurring the adjustments become, the less convincing the adjusted measure may be.
The Bottom Line
Non-GAAP measures can clarify performance when used carefully, but they are not a substitute for GAAP financial statements. Read them as management's adjusted view, then test that view against GAAP results, cash flow, consistency, and the reconciliation.